>>37324

No, that's what he wants to be found. Out of curiosity, what is the name of the manga that came from? Yes, I know it's the only chapter like it, but still. Curious.

I don't know if it's the real title but online it's called "Nickelodeon"....yes like the tv network...total WTF moment for me.
Anyway keep trying to find manga I mentioned earlier please, and I'll keep trying to find more gems like this one :)

>>37303
>Thing that bugs me, why was I the one who got reported to DA's oppresionators and all the others haven't been touched?

The person that reported you quit the group shortly after, because nobody approved of what she did to you.

>>37317
It was the November 2011 issue not the October 2011 issue.

>>37335
So did you find a link!? a source!? please tell me you found a download link!!!

>>37328

What the fuck did I just read? I went through the 9 chapters that existed, and I honestly have no idea. They all seem to be one shots that are really weird in nature. The art style and general atmosphere of the story is interesting though.

As to 汐月くらげ/ デュラハンさん, I'm only just picking up Japanese so my kanji is weak, but it reads <name> kurage / durahansan (Dullahan-san). kurage seems to translate to jellyfish...?

The two kanji seem to be a name, though I might be wrong. I recognize the second character as getsu (month/moon), but not too sure on the first one.

Hope that helps.

>>37303
>Thing that bugs me, why was I the one who got reported to DA's oppresionators and all the others haven't been touched?

This is a guess, but I think it might be because your "Play-Doh" story fell under "pornography" instead of romance under the rules. The story was 99% fucking, as opposed to romance then fucking. Still, it doesn't seem right that he got banned for one or two bad stories, don't you usually just get the offenders removed?

>>37334
That doesn't really answer his question. I think it might be because NBM people keep to themselves, and the fetish is obscure to begin with, keeping average folks from coming across it and reporting. And literature being more time consuming for moderators to evaluate, as a picture can be judged in a second, whereas stories take time to read.

>>37339

As to this:
"This is a guess, but I think it might be because your "Play-Doh" story fell under "pornography" instead of romance under the rules. The story was 99% fucking, as opposed to romance then fucking. Still, it doesn't seem right that he got banned for one or two bad stories, don't you usually just get the offenders removed?"

I actually had 6 stories posted that quantified in DA's rules as literate pornography. Perhaps that was too many offenses to skip over. Whatever the case, the magic fallic mushroom commented to me one day, citing the TOS with links, next day BANNED!

As for the rest, NBM fan or not, generally if someone enjoys the read, they're not going to think about whether it fits the rules or not, nor even consider reporting said person for breaking them. It just doesn't make sense. I'm happy the other writers are untouched and still up on DA, but it makes you scratch your head that with all the cross connections, if they found me and had me nuked, they could have easily found a dozen others to have nuked also. Did I specifically write one story that offended someone who has no concept of "changing the channel"?

And one of you mentioned "The person that reported you quit the group shortly after, because nobody approved of what she did to you." This implies that somebody knows who did, and again, if they got run off for turning me in, wouldn't it make sense for this person to turn the rest in too, in the sick logic of vengence?

Ah well, interesting enough convo, but getting rather off topic now. I'm about to post up two of my previously completed stories tonight over on the forum, including part one of "The Collection" which very much fits the topic here.

Cheers!

>>37339
Yeah it does. It was seriously because of one chick who hated seeing fall-apart get sexualized and she was about to go after even more artists who did stories like that. The group unequivocally hated her for doing that, so she quit and tried to get as many people as possible to do the same. All because she doesn't like sex in her fall apart fantasies.

tl;dr - gurl b crazy

>>37271
>>37277
>>37274
>>37281


cheesium here. i've been ridiculously busy (starting a business) so haven't been following gurochan or anything else really.

i do have a story in mind that some of you might like, it'd be a bit more 'detachment' oriented. no idea when it might get done, but it's been sketched out.

with melody, coffee, etc, i kind of ended up writing myself into a corner because the characters were too 'powerful' and they stopped being interesting to write (for me, part of what's interesting is the loss of control). and inanimate tfs do for whatever reason interest me.

other than that i'd agree with every assessment made so far :) truleymorbid, i was sorry to see you go, but DA is more of a 'wide audience' kind of place anyway. i'll certainly be keeping up with your stuff on the new site.

>>37609

Ms. Fortune on Tali?

Holy crossovers Batman!

i got found some new pictures of Ms. Fortune i will post two of them.she got quiet popular.i love her.now i have a reason for buying a playstation 3

image >>24616 and >>25905 and >>28806 and >>27365
where you get from and show original image plase

>>24616
I forget, but I got it from g.e-hentai
>>25905 and >>27365
from Battle Goddess 2 (from Eushuli)an eroge, you can find it in G.e-hentai too

>>28806
same with this, from R-15 anime eps 1

and before you get curious, it's all mods.

>>37647
Explains the lousy quality.

>>24616 what is the name of this ?

>>37652
I never had any training in art or design,so forgive me if I can give any "professional quality" mods.
>>37655
sorry, I don't remember. I just randomly mod it from g.e-hentai.

this image >>24616

>>37652
It is not cool to call someone else's work lousy.
DBJ, I have enjoyed your work for sometime now. Thanks a lot for sharing and creating all your stuff.

>>37675
>it's not cool to call someone else's work lousy.
That's the DeviantArt philosophy right there.

Check this out.

>>37675
I dunno dude, does this stuff really do it for you? Are you still capable of being turned on when half the image is blurry? No AA on the neck cut? Would you be content with taking an image of a model, going into MS Paint and erasing her head?

I've seen his stuff for a while on NBM groups and he's barely improved (or was that whorher?); he once tried to sell one of his terrible photoshops for money. I know that you have to start somewhere with those kinds of skills, but it's tiresome.

>>37657
I'm willing to bet you that most photoshop users are self-taught.

>>37676
The fundamental reason DeviantArt sucks. Fragile egos.

>>37683
since you seem to be a perfectionist, why don't you do some editing (or whatever it called) on some of my work? I'd really appreciate it if you can make it better.

And I think it was whorher who tried to sell his work.(I don't remember ever posting any of my mod outside this site)

My 2c worth: Everyone's art can be improved; via study, practice, and experiment. Most people merely learn to do what they like, and do not study farther.

It is wise to consider the audience. This forum has a stated purpose, the appreciation of drawn art. There is a bias against manipulations... which is largely justified.

You cannot improve upon a problem you cannot observe. No one can notice everything. Don't be butthurt by a criticism merely because it is from an asshole. Don't be an asshole unless it is necessary... or really amusing to others.

Anti-Aliasing... google it, you can learn a lot. It's a serious problem when working in digital art. There are a number of ways to deal with it, but the key is to notice the harsh lines... and do something. If you don't see it, you may have a crappy monitor, but you certainly are not zooming in on these shops to see what is changed, and comparing it to the lines that are natural. I've tweaked one of the shops, since, well... let us say I have my doubts that anyone else would take up the challenge. ^_^

>>37683 Hey, I actually did start with MSPaint! It's been 14 years, and some of those bastards took me a very long time to make only half-crappy. I started making them because I saw some utter drek online and thought I could probably do better. Sadly, even with MSPaint... I was RIGHT. XD I've learned a lot since then, and found better tools... but there's a hell of a lot to learn.

It's really hard to get good constructive criticism. It's really really hard to receive it, if you get it. Last time someone tried to teach me a trick, it took me ages to figure out how to apply it. I couldn't see how it was supposed to work, or how it made my life easier.

I hope and I pray, if you are going to complain about someone's work... that you prove you can do that tiny bit better. To earn the right to be respected for your opinion, and not just possess it. We make this place awesome by making awesome art! The more awesome we can make it, and each other, the better.

>>37689
I don't have to be a master of something to criticize. You don't have to be a movie director yourself to express a negative opinion about a movie. I don't use photoshop, but I know a terrible job when I see one. I never, at any point, claimed to be a PS user. I don't have to be a sous chef to know undercooked meat.

I've hung around NBM groups for a long time, and I always have to sift through 100 garbage images before I find one good one. Every time someone posts a terrible mess of a photoshop job, it's always "good job!" Even when anyone with a working eyeball can see no effort to hide obvious artefacts. I've sat around these groups hoping that everyone would slowly get better, but that hasn't happened; the lousy shoopers stay as they are, and the good ones fade away.

I still don't understand the choice in source material. Why anime and manga stills? It seems (somehow) harder to make it "believable" than if you took regular stock photos (not postable here, of course) and did a proper job of them a la DougS (what happened to him?) and TSA.

Anyway, as with all things, before you post it, just think "Is this the best I can do?" before posting it. Prove to yourself and everyone else that you don't write/draw/shoop for the sole purpose of bringing your fetish to life. Have some pride.

speaking about manga and anime, that's because I love watching or reading them. I don't like browsing for photos just for mod them. Also I'm actually more of a gamer than modder, so I spend most of my time playing game (sometime if I found something to mod, it can take few months before I have time to do it).
and thanks for the Anti-aliasing part, I had never get it what it means.

>>37691
You're a gamer and you don't know what anti-aliasing is?

>>37718
lol ya, somehow my PC always auto-turn off the anti-aliasing part. All I care the game is work so I didn't pay much attention to that....

>>37718
some vidcards take care of that in the hardware, so you never need to muck about with the settings. (or you can, but they don't do anything more for you.)

>>37819
http://headlessfetish.deviantart.com/

The deviantart account where this image came from.

Family Guy episode "Forget me not". A girl thinks her friend is so attractive.

>>37308
So uh... did we ever find out what this is? Seeing how "anonymous one" has that specific chapter, I would imagine he has the rest... a 'sauce' and/or download link wouldn't be too much to ask, would it?

And yes, I understand that is the only chapter where the headless thing happens.

>>37918
http://www.mangahere.com/manga/nickelodeon/

sorry for not posting the source, I thought people could just google it and find it instantly. But thank you to the one that posted a link :)

Some mod action I did.

>>38022

That's her right.

>>38029
You are correct. It was really late when I finished that thing last night.

>>37923
Where are the pictures of the headless girls?

>>38208
It's in chapter 3, but it's not really much of anything. Much like a lot of 'finds' by the 'NBM' community.

http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=manga&illust_id=27081529
http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=manga&illust_id=27176511

from deviantart

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-q1zQj7qvY

headless host Rhonda Shear

nukekubi are monsters found in Japanese folklore. By day, nukekubi appear to be normal human beings. By night, however, their heads detach at the neck smoothly from their bodies and fly about independently in search of human prey.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nukekubi